Ether to Become Net-Inflationary Over 2 Years After PoS Merge

·

Two years and 143 days after Ethereum’s historic transition to proof-of-stake—commonly known as “the Merge”—Ether (ETH) is on the verge of becoming net-inflationary once again. This shift marks a pivotal moment in Ethereum’s evolving economic model, signaling both progress and complexity in its journey toward scalable, sustainable blockchain infrastructure.

According to data from Ultrasound Money, Ethereum currently experiences a daily net supply increase of just over 1,570 ETH. At this rate, the balance is expected to tip into positive territory within the next 24 hours, ending more than a year of deflationary supply trends.

👉 Discover how Ethereum's shifting supply dynamics impact long-term investment strategies.

The Rise and Fall of ‘Ultrasound Money’

The concept of “ultrasound money” emerged shortly after the Merge, envisioning ETH as a deflationary digital asset whose scarcity would increase over time due to more tokens being burned than issued. However, this vision had a rocky start.

Launched during one of the deepest bear markets in crypto history, the Merge initially failed to trigger significant deflation. Network activity remained low, resulting in minimal ETH burn from base fees. The collapse of FTX further dampened sentiment, casting uncertainty over Ethereum’s future value proposition.

But as market conditions improved and decentralized applications gained traction, so did on-chain activity. By mid-January 2023, Ethereum officially entered deflationary mode—burning more ETH through transaction fees than it issued to validators. This trend persisted for over a year, culminating in a post-Merge supply reduction peak of over 450,000 ETH, valued at nearly $1.6 billion at the time.

The Dencun Upgrade and the Blob Revolution

The turning point came in early April with the implementation of the Dencun upgrade, specifically EIP-4844, which introduced “blobs.” These temporary data storage units allow Layer 2 (L2) networks to post transaction data off the main Ethereum chain for just 18 days, drastically reducing gas costs.

This innovation is central to Ethereum’s “Surge” roadmap—a long-term vision focused on scalability through rollups and sharding. As a result, L2 fees have plummeted compared to mainnet, making transactions faster and far more affordable.

However, lower gas fees mean less ETH is burned from base fees, directly impacting the supply equation. With reduced burn rates and consistent issuance to stakers, Ethereum has now returned to an inflationary supply model—a notable shift for the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency.

While some investors may view this as a step backward from the “ultrasound” ideal, it reflects a maturing ecosystem where usability and adoption are prioritized over artificial scarcity.

Inflation Reconsidered: A Net Positive for Ethereum?

It’s crucial to contextualize Ethereum’s current inflation against what came before. Under the old proof-of-work (PoW) system, annual inflation averaged 3.3%, leading to the issuance of millions of new ETH each year.

Had Ethereum remained on PoW, projections show an additional 9.5 million ETH would have entered circulation since the Merge—worth over $25 billion at current prices. In contrast, today’s modest inflation under PoS represents a dramatically improved efficiency model.

Moreover, energy consumption dropped by over 99.9% after the switch to PoS, reinforcing Ethereum’s position as one of the most environmentally sustainable blockchains.

👉 Explore how proof-of-stake economics are reshaping digital asset valuations.

Scaling Forward: Gas Limit Increase Signals Validator Confidence

Further evidence of Ethereum’s ongoing evolution emerged recently when validators voted to increase the network’s gas limit—the first such change since the London hard fork in August 2021, which occurred under PoW.

This adjustment allows more transactions or more complex smart contract executions per block, improving throughput without compromising security. It also signals growing confidence among stakers in the network’s stability and long-term roadmap.

Toni Wahrstätter, a well-known Ethereum researcher, noted on X (formerly Twitter):

“For the first time in Ethereum PoS, validators have voted to increase the gas limit and it's happening now. 🎉”

Such upgrades are essential as Ethereum prepares for future phases of the Surge, including full sharding and further L2 optimizations.

Beyond Tech: Can Ethereum Reignite Value Creation?

Despite these technical advancements, ETH has faced criticism for underperforming Bitcoin in 2024. Some community members argue that while engineering progress continues, innovation in value-generating use cases—particularly in decentralized finance (DeFi)—has stagnated.

A debate has emerged: should Ethereum focus solely on infrastructure, or actively foster ecosystems that drive demand for ETH?

Even Vitalik Buterin has expressed frustration with certain critiques of the Ethereum Foundation’s leadership, stating:

“This is not how this game works.”

Yet in response to community pressure, part of the Foundation’s treasury is now being allocated to a DeFi Multisig wallet, signaling a renewed commitment to supporting financial innovation on-chain.

This strategic deployment could catalyze new liquidity incentives, yield opportunities, and utility-driven demand for ETH—balancing technical scalability with economic vitality.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What does it mean for ETH to be net-inflationary?
A: When ETH is net-inflationary, more tokens are issued to validators than are burned through transaction fees. This results in a gradual increase in total supply, contrasting with deflationary periods where supply decreases.

Q: Why did Ethereum become inflationary again after being deflationary?
A: The introduction of “blobs” via EIP-4844 reduced gas fees on Layer 2 networks, which decreased the amount of ETH burned per transaction. Lower burns combined with steady issuance led to a return to inflation.

Q: Is inflation bad for Ethereum’s price?
A: Not necessarily. Moderate inflation can support network security and decentralization. What matters most is whether demand for ETH—through staking, DeFi usage, or NFTs—grows faster than supply.

Q: How does proof-of-stake reduce inflation compared to proof-of-work?
A: PoS requires far less issuance to secure the network. Under PoW, miners needed high block rewards; under PoS, validators are rewarded more efficiently, reducing overall dilution.

Q: Will Ethereum ever go deflationary again?
A: Yes—during periods of high network usage, base fee burns can exceed issuance. If adoption surges (e.g., during a bull market), ETH could re-enter deflationary territory.

Q: What is the purpose of increasing Ethereum’s gas limit?
A: Raising the gas limit allows more transactions per block, improving scalability and user experience. It reflects validator confidence in network stability and demand growth.


Ethereum’s journey since the Merge has been anything but linear. From fleeting deflation to strategic inflation, from energy efficiency gains to scaling breakthroughs—it’s clear that ETH’s economic model is dynamic and responsive.

Core keywords: Ethereum, proof-of-stake, ETH inflation, Dencun upgrade, EIP-4844, Layer 2 scaling, gas limit increase, DeFi

As Ethereum continues to evolve, investors and developers alike must look beyond simple supply metrics and consider the broader picture: a resilient, scalable, and increasingly usable blockchain platform built for decades—not just market cycles.

👉 Stay ahead of Ethereum's next economic shift with real-time analytics and insights.