The Ethereum Merge stands as one of the most transformative events in the crypto space since Bitcoin’s inception. By shifting from proof-of-work (PoW) to proof-of-stake (PoS), Ethereum has drastically reduced its energy consumption by an estimated 99.95%, addressing long-standing environmental concerns. However, this consensus shift introduces new challenges—particularly around centralization risks in staking. Among these, Lido, the largest liquid staking protocol, has become a focal point of debate.
This analysis explores the implications of staking centralization post-Merge, focusing on Lido's dominant market position, governance concentration, and potential risks to Ethereum’s decentralization and censorship resistance.
Understanding Ethereum’s Post-Merge Staking Landscape
With Ethereum’s transition to PoS, validators now secure the network by locking up ETH instead of consuming computational power. While this improves efficiency, it raises questions about decentralization, validator diversity, and control over network consensus.
Currently, only about 11.3% of the total ETH supply is staked—a relatively low figure compared to other chains like Polygon (~41%) or Solana (~77%). Despite the high barrier to solo staking (32 ETH), over 80,000 unique depositors have participated. However, the distribution of control tells a different story: roughly 64% of staked ETH is controlled by just five entities.
Among them:
- Lido holds 31% of all staked ETH.
- Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance collectively account for ~30%.
👉 Discover how leading platforms are shaping the future of decentralized finance.
This concentration highlights a paradox: while PoS was meant to democratize participation, economies of scale and user convenience have led to centralization—both through centralized exchanges (CEXs) and dominant liquid staking providers like Lido.
Why Liquid Staking? Bridging Accessibility and Liquidity
Liquid staking protocols like Lido solve two major barriers:
- High entry cost: Solo staking requires 32 ETH (~$50,000+).
- Lack of liquidity: Staked ETH was locked until the Shanghai upgrade enabled withdrawals.
By issuing derivative tokens such as stETH, Lido allows users to stake any amount of ETH and receive a tradable asset in return. This innovation has driven adoption: 65% of all staked ETH goes through liquid staking services, with Lido dominating the non-CEX segment at over 90% market share.
However, this convenience comes with trade-offs—primarily increased systemic risk and governance centralization.
Lido’s Governance: Power Concentration in Few Hands
Lido operates as a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), governed by its LDO token. While designed to be community-driven, governance power is heavily concentrated.
Key findings:
- The top 9 LDO holders (excluding treasury) control approximately 46% of voting power.
- A small number of wallets consistently dominate proposal participation.
- Early investors and venture funds like Paradigm and Dragonfly Capital hold significant stakes.
This concentration creates a vulnerability: if external pressure is applied to major holders—especially doxxed institutions—they may comply with regulatory demands, potentially enabling transaction censorship or protocol-level changes that compromise decentralization.
Even “smart money” wallets, known for strategic on-chain activity, represent only 6.4% of total voting power (rising to 9.3% recently), indicating limited grassroots influence.
FAQ: Common Questions About Lido and Staking Risks
Q: Can Lido censor transactions on Ethereum?
A: Not directly. But if Lido controls a majority of validators, it could theoretically influence which transactions are included via governance decisions or MEV strategies.
Q: Is Lido more centralized than CEXs?
A: Structurally, no—but functionally, yes. While CEXs are legally regulated entities, Lido’s DAO structure can still be swayed by concentrated token ownership.
Q: What happens if Lido gets compromised?
A: A governance attack could alter node operators, freeze withdrawals, or redirect rewards—posing systemic risk given Lido’s dominance.
Q: Why not just use smaller staking providers?
A: Network effects favor leaders. Smaller platforms lack liquidity, integrations, and yield optimization, making migration less appealing.
Q: How does MEV affect centralization?
A: Larger stakers like Lido capture more MEV (Maximal Extractable Value), increasing their profitability and reinforcing their market lead.
Addressing Centralization: Can Lido Become Truly Decentralized?
Recognizing these risks, Lido’s community is exploring reforms to improve decentralization and resilience:
1. Dual Governance Model (LDO + stETH)
Lido is considering a dual-layer governance system where:
- LDO holders retain primary voting rights.
- stETH holders gain veto power over proposals that directly impact their interests.
If an LDO-backed proposal harms stETH holders and is vetoed, dissenting LDO voters may face slashing penalties. This aligns incentives but risks governance gridlock.
👉 Explore how next-gen protocols are redefining decentralized governance models.
2. Permissionless Withdrawals Post-Shanghai
After the Shanghai upgrade, users can finally withdraw staked ETH. This introduces competition:
- Users dissatisfied with Lido can migrate to alternatives like Rocket Pool.
- Increased exit flexibility may pressure Lido to enhance transparency and decentralization.
3. Geographic and Operator Diversification
Lido currently relies on 29 node operators, mostly based in North America and Europe. To reduce jurisdictional risk:
- The DAO aims to expand into geographically diverse regions.
- Stricter criteria for operator selection aim to prevent collusion.
Will the Shanghai Upgrade Trigger a Massive ETH Sell-Off?
A common concern is whether unlocking staked ETH will flood the market. Let’s break it down:
Key Facts:
- ~71% of staked ETH is underwater (purchased above current price).
- Only 18% of non-liquid stakers are in profit—the group most likely to sell.
- Withdrawals are rate-limited: ~6 validators (~192 ETH) exit per epoch (~6.4 minutes).
- Full withdrawal queue could take up to 300 days for all validators.
Given these constraints, a sudden crash due to mass selling is unlikely. Profitable early stakers (e.g., those who staked at $600 in late 2020) may realize gains—but many are long-term believers unlikely to dump.
Moreover, liquid stakers already have exposure via stETH and similar tokens, reducing redemption urgency.
Smart Money and Whale Activity: Bullish Signals Ahead?
On-chain data reveals telling trends:
- ETH millionaires and billionaires continue accumulating, unfazed by market volatility.
- Smart money wallets, typically more tactical, began increasing positions after the June 2022 market bottom.
- Whale accumulation suggests confidence in Ethereum’s post-Merge fundamentals.
This sustained buying pressure indicates strong conviction that Ethereum’s value proposition strengthens under PoS—despite short-term macro headwinds.
The Road Ahead: Balancing Innovation and Decentralization
Liquid staking solved a critical problem: enabling broad access to staking rewards without sacrificing liquidity. But success brings responsibility.
Lido’s dominance mirrors a “winner-takes-most” dynamic seen across DeFi. If unchecked, this could undermine Ethereum’s core principles of openness, censorship resistance, and decentralized control.
Yet there’s reason for optimism:
- Awareness of centralization risks is growing.
- Active development in governance design (e.g., dual voting) shows commitment to evolution.
- Competition from Rocket Pool and future entrants keeps pressure on incumbents.
Ultimately, Ethereum’s security depends not just on how much ETH is staked—but who controls it, and how decisions are made.
Final Thoughts
The Merge marked a technical triumph for Ethereum. But its long-term success hinges on social and economic resilience.
As Lido continues to lead the liquid staking race, it must prioritize:
- Governance decentralization
- Transparent node operations
- Incentive alignment across stakeholders
Without meaningful progress, the very protocols built to prevent CEX dominance may become new points of failure.
For users and investors alike, staying informed—and actively participating in governance—is no longer optional. It’s essential to preserving Ethereum’s decentralized future.
👉 Stay ahead of the curve with insights into blockchain innovation and decentralized networks.