The crypto world is abuzz with news that Ripple is preparing to launch its own USD-pegged stablecoin—a move that could redefine the company’s trajectory and raise critical questions about the future of its native token, XRP. While Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse frames this development as a natural evolution rather than a pivot away from XRP, the implications are profound. This shift reflects broader industry trends, evolving regulatory pressures, and changing demands from institutional partners.
As the $150 billion stablecoin market grows increasingly competitive, Ripple’s entry signals both ambition and necessity. But what does this mean for XRP? And how does it reshape Ripple’s long-term strategy?
Ripple’s Evolving Vision: From XRP to Stablecoin?
Ripple’s upcoming stablecoin is expected to be fully backed 1:1 by cash equivalents such as U.S. dollar deposits, Treasury bills, and other low-risk assets. The goal? To offer a more transparent and trustworthy alternative to dominant players like Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC).
👉 Discover how leading crypto platforms are adapting to the rise of stablecoins.
This move isn’t just about capturing market share—it's a strategic response to real-world challenges. Ripple’s existing business model, built on the XRP Ledger, On-Demand Liquidity (ODL), and the RippleNet payment network, has faced persistent hurdles in gaining widespread adoption among traditional financial institutions.
Despite forging partnerships with over 200 banks and financial institutions across 40+ countries, actual usage of XRP for cross-border settlements remains limited. Many pilots stay internal or experimental, rarely reaching consumer-facing applications.
David Lighton, CEO of Diameter Pay and former Ripple collaborator, noted:
“Ripple has a first-class data infrastructure. But they don’t sell much of it anymore.”
He used Ripple’s ODL (originally xRapid) in early remittance tests between the U.S. and the Philippines but eventually moved on. Still, he acknowledges value in certain use cases—particularly real-time settlement for small tokenized transactions and working capital optimization.
Yet, even high-profile partnerships have faltered. Santander, one of Europe’s largest banks, paused its engagement after determining XRP didn’t meet customer needs. The much-publicized collaboration with MoneyGram ended amid rising costs and regulatory uncertainty—especially around whether XRP qualifies as a security.
The Regulatory Shadow Over XRP
At the heart of Ripple’s identity crisis lies a four-year legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC alleges that Ripple raised over $1.3 billion through unregistered securities offerings by selling XRP, particularly during institutional sales totaling $770 million—deemed violations of Section 5 of the Securities Act.
In a landmark 2023 ruling, Judge Analisa Torres determined that XRP is not inherently a security when traded on public exchanges. However, she also confirmed that Ripple’s direct sales to accredited investors constituted investment contracts under securities law.
This duality creates a fragile foundation. For years, Ripple relied heavily on quarterly XRP sales to fund operations—a practice now under intense scrutiny. With potential fines reaching up to $2 billion, the company faces urgent pressure to diversify revenue streams beyond token sales.
Enter the stablecoin: a regulated, asset-backed instrument aligned with institutional comfort zones and regulatory expectations.
Why Stablecoins Are Winning Institutional Trust
Stablecoins eliminate the volatility barrier that plagues native cryptocurrencies like XRP and even Bitcoin (BTC). As Austen Campbell, former Paxos stablecoin fund manager and Columbia Business School professor, put it:
“Nobody uses XRP itself as a payment rail—just like nobody really uses BTC.”
While technically possible, using volatile assets for payments introduces unacceptable risk for banks and enterprises focused on compliance and predictability.
👉 See how next-generation financial rails are redefining global payments.
PayPal’s recent launch of its PUSD stablecoin on the Xoom platform exemplifies this shift. By enabling seamless cross-border remittances through a regulated, dollar-backed digital asset, PayPal offers a glimpse into the future—one where functionality trumps ideology.
For Ripple, launching a stablecoin may not signal the death of XRP, but it does mark a strategic retreat from relying on it as the centerpiece of its financial infrastructure.
The Road Ahead: Coexistence or Replacement?
Ripple maintains that XRP still plays a vital role—particularly in liquidity provisioning and network efficiency on the XRP Ledger. However, the writing may be on the wall: institutions want stability, clarity, and regulatory alignment.
The rise of regulated stablecoins suggests a broader trend: crypto is maturing from speculative innovation toward utility-driven finance. Circle took years to pivot from peer-to-peer payments to becoming the force behind USDC. Likewise, Ripple’s journey—from blockchain payments pioneer to potential issuer of a regulated stablecoin—mirrors this evolutionary path.
Still, challenges remain:
- Can Ripple differentiate its stablecoin in a crowded market?
- Will regulators view this new product more favorably than past XRP sales?
- And crucially—can XRP maintain relevance alongside a dollar-pegged rival?
👉 Explore how blockchain innovation continues to reshape finance in 2025.
Only time will tell. But one thing is clear: Ripple is adapting to survive—and thrive—in an era where trust, transparency, and compliance matter more than ever.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Is Ripple replacing XRP with its new stablecoin?
No official announcement suggests XRP will be phased out. Instead, the stablecoin appears designed to complement Ripple’s ecosystem by offering a stable settlement option for institutions wary of volatility.
Will the new stablecoin be built on the XRP Ledger?
While unconfirmed, it's plausible given Ripple’s investment in XRPL development. A native stablecoin on XRPL could enhance interoperability and network utility.
How does this affect XRP’s price and adoption?
Short-term impact is uncertain. Long-term, increased institutional engagement via the stablecoin could indirectly benefit XRP by boosting ecosystem activity—but only if adoption follows.
Is Ripple’s stablecoin regulated?
Given current U.S. regulatory scrutiny, any new stablecoin from Ripple will likely adhere to strict compliance standards, including full reserve backing and regular audits.
Can individuals use Ripple’s stablecoin like USDC or USDT?
If launched publicly, yes—assuming it supports major wallets and exchanges. Initial focus may be on enterprise and bank-grade applications.
Does this mean XRP failed as a payment solution?
Not necessarily. While adoption has been limited, technical capabilities remain strong. The issue was less about technology and more about market readiness and regulatory clarity.
Core Keywords: Ripple, XRP, stablecoin, RippleNet, On-Demand Liquidity, SEC lawsuit, XRPL, USD-pegged stablecoin